Insights Newsletter: February ‘26
View The Full February ‘26 Newsletter Here.
Welcome,
This month has been completely anchored in the future, and honestly, in many ways, it feels like something that has been slowly building for most of my career if you look closely enough.
We officially launched the Future-Facing Framework alongside the first version of the Future-Facing Whitepaper. I say the first version very intentionally, because anything designed for a changing world should expect to evolve alongside it. But releasing it felt like putting a flag in the ground for the direction I believe systems, organisations, and leadership need to start moving toward.
One of the strongest reflections that kept surfacing while building this work is that we simply cannot build sustainable futures on broken foundations. Many of the structures we still rely on were designed for slower, more predictable environments, and somehow all built by the minds of “PDF-files” who belong in jail.
What we’re navigating for the next era needs to be fundamentally different. Complexity has increased, interdependence has deepened, and in many cases, we are trying to apply new solutions using outdated assumptions. That is where fractures start to appear.
For me, the framework is less about providing answers and more about helping people orient themselves. Being future-facing is not about chasing trends or predicting outcomes. It’s about making sure you are facing the right direction while you build, whether that is in your organisation, your leadership, or something you are creating from scratch. Direction matters more than speed if the goal is to build something that lasts.
This month also reminded me how much imagination sits underneath strategy and governance. When ideas feel too complex to solve through logic alone, I often write short stories to explore how they will solve them. Recently, I found myself deep in thought yet again on how emerging technologies, particularly general and ambient AI, are often being built without deeply considering the human psychology they mirror or inherit. That reflection turned into a short story about building and raising an autonomous robot, which in many ways became a thought experiment about how we guide intelligence, responsibility, and agency as technology becomes more integrated into our lives.
Alongside this, I spent time turning the lens inward. As someone who studies founders and the futures they are trying to create, it felt important to step back and become the subject of my own observation. Perspective shapes everything we design. Before anyone builds a company, raises capital, or writes a strategy, there is always imagination first. New ideas rarely come from looking harder at the same thing; they come from learning to see differently. If you need help being inspired, we’ve added a collection of paintings to our website that mirror little clouds to spark a thought or two.
On a personal level, this month has also been about leaning further into experimentation and trusting what feels authentic, even when it looks unconventional. If we want to create different outcomes, we have to be willing to do things differently, sometimes in business, and sometimes in our own patterns and routines, while we are building something larger than ourselves.
Releasing the Future-Facing Whitepaper feels like opening a much bigger conversation. I’m incredibly excited to keep developing this work alongside the leaders, founders, and institutions who are also thinking deeply about what responsible, resilient, and imaginative futures can look like.
Best,
Alison Mackie
Founder & Director
RobinsonHewitt Consulting
FUTURISTIC THOUGHTS TO PLAY WITH
I’ve had Back to the Future stuck in my head lately, specifically the scene at the end where Doc says, “Where we’re going, we don’t need roads.” That line has been looping in my thoughts because it perfectly captures one of my favourite ways to think about how to build for the future.
Sometimes the most interesting ideas don’t come from improving what already exists. They come from removing the assumption that the current way is the only way.
One exercise I use when I’m working through big, slightly chaotic ideas is to imagine that somewhere, another fold of Earth, another timeline, another stage of technological evolution, the problem has already been solved. Then I work backwards from there. Throw the anchor out and ask, “How did they do it?”
This is how an idea I’ve had for years about flying cars keeps resurfacing. And yes, part of it was sparked by the crystal-powered time machine from Napoleon Dynamite, which still makes me laugh, but also strangely stuck with me. (I have other thoughts there too…)
I’ve always been fascinated by the idea that future transport might not rely on traditional propulsion or fuel at all. More like… what if movement eventually comes from entirely new ways of interacting with energy itself?
There’s already early research exploring energy storage within highly stable material structures, including nuclear diamond batteries, a technology that uses artificial diamonds to safely encase small amounts of radioactive material, generating a very low but continuous electrical current through natural decay. That kind of thinking opens a much bigger imaginative door for me.
It makes me wonder what happens if energy storage, material science, electromagnetic forces, and environmental discovery eventually start overlapping in ways we don’t fully understand yet. I’ve even played with story ideas around what happens if new energy properties are only unlocked after major geological or environmental shifts. Not as a total prediction, but just as a way of stretching how we think about resource discovery and technological leaps. Historically, some of humanity’s biggest advancements have come from discovering or understanding materials differently.
I don’t know whether ideas like this belong purely in storytelling or whether fragments of them eventually become engineering problems someone else will solve. But I’ve learned that some of the most interesting innovation starts as slightly strange, slightly impossible thought experiments.
So here’s something to play with this month:
If you removed your assumptions about how something has to work… how might it work instead? Ask another fold or version of yourself how they’re doing it.
Sometimes the future doesn’t need a better road; it just needs entirely different ways of transporting ideas.